A trusted route for creatives and marketers seeking contract roles with larger organizations.
Aquent (Freelance marketplace, founded 1986 in US) is built for creative professionals, marketers, and enterprise hiring teams. This page covers the fee structure, country availability, and how it compares to the alternatives UK/CA/AU freelancers already use.
Quick Verdict
Best for: creative professionals, marketers, and enterprise hiring teams
Tagline: Global staffing and talent services for creative and digital work
Visit Aquent →Key Facts
| Category | Freelance marketplace |
| FX fee | N/A |
| Free account | Yes |
| HQ | US |
| Founded | 1986 |
| Website | aquent.com |
Who Aquent Is For
A trusted route for creatives and marketers seeking contract roles with larger organizations. It's most relevant for creative professionals, marketers, and enterprise hiring teams — and the FX/feature mix tends to suit users who already lean toward freelance workflows rather than generic personal banking.
Fees & Pricing
Aquent publishes its current pricing on aquent.com. The published FX figure is N/A above the mid-market rate. Two caveats:
- Card spend vs receive vs send — most platforms publish a "headline" FX that only applies to one flow. Always cross-check the actual rate against a Wise/Revolut quote on the day you transact.
- Plan tier matters — free tiers usually carry the highest spread; paid plans often reduce it materially. The "is it cheaper than Wise?" answer almost always depends on which tier you're on.
Cross-check before you commit: Run a single test transaction in the corridor you actually use and compare the all-in landed amount against the same trade on Wise. Published rate cards rarely capture the full cost.
Country Availability
Aquent is headquartered in US. Availability for UK, Canada and Australia freelancers depends on which entity serves your country — confirm directly on aquent.com before signing up, since regulated payment platforms frequently change supported regions.
How Aquent Compares
For UK / Canada / Australia freelancers, the practical comparison set is usually:
- Wise — still the FX-cost benchmark at 0.41%. Hard to beat for receive-and-convert.
- Payoneer — the default for Upwork and Fiverr withdrawals.
- Revolut Business — strong if you also want invoicing and team cards.
- Aquent — see above.
If your work depends on Upwork/Fiverr withdrawal speed, Payoneer is likely still the simpler choice. If you bill clients directly and care about FX cost above all else, Wise usually wins. Aquent fits when its specific freelance feature set is the deciding factor — not when generic multi-currency is the only need.
How to Get Started
- Visit aquent.com and create an account.
- Complete identity verification (KYC) — typical for any regulated freelance platform.
- Add funding source or connect to the platform you'll receive payments from.
- Run a small test transaction first to verify the all-in cost matches the published rate.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Aquent? Aquent is a Freelance marketplace platform. A trusted route for creatives and marketers seeking contract roles with larger organizations.
How much does Aquent charge in FX fees? Aquent charges N/A on currency conversion based on its published pricing. Always cross-check the current rate card on aquent.com before relying on this — fintech pricing changes frequently.
Is Aquent free to use? Yes — there's a free account tier.
Who is Aquent best for? creative professionals, marketers, and enterprise hiring teams
Is Aquent a Wise alternative? Aquent overlaps with parts of Wise's feature set, but freelancers in the UK, Canada and Australia should compare both side-by-side — Wise still leads on FX cost in most corridors (0.41%). The right pick depends on your client geography and whether you need a business account or a personal multi-currency wallet.
This review was last updated 2026-05-17. Fees and availability may change — always check Aquent's website for the latest information.
feebite may earn a commission if you sign up via our links. This does not affect our editorial ratings.